Second Trimester Sonogram for evaluation of Soft Marker Screening for chromosomal abnormalities
Assembled By :
Niou lab
Latest Update:
2020/05/18
Second Trimester Sonogram for evaluation of Soft Marker Screening for chromosomal abnormalities
High-level markers:
- Non ossified Nasal Bone (LR= 6.6)
Mid-level markers:
- Nuchal skin fold (LR= 3.8)
- Cerebral ventriculomegaly (LR= 3.8)
- ARSA (Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery) (LR= 3.9)
Low-level markers:
- Echogenic bowel foci (LR= 1.6)
- Mild pyelectasis (LR= 1.1)
Soft Markers and Risk Assessment
It is important to realize that none of the soft markers for Down syndrome are abnormalities.
The way that most of these markers were determined is by reviewing either images or videotapes from ultrasound scans done of both normal babies and babies with Down syndrome.
If a certain percentage of normal babies carries one of these markers, but a higher percentage of Down syndrome pregnancies carries a marker, then the marker can be used to statistically adjust the Down syndrome risk calculation.
Overall, about 7 percent of pregnancies will show a soft marker increasing the risk calculation for Down syndrome.
About 93 percent of pregnancies will show no soft markers, and when no soft markers are seen, the Down syndrome risk calculation is lowered.
We multiply the risk calculation by a factor of 0.4, so that if the risk calculation was 1 per 1,000, and no soft markers are seen, then our final risk calculation would be 0.4 per 1,000.
Soft Marker Screening for Edaward Syndrome
Mid-level markers:
- Choroid plexus cysts (LR=7-10)
High-level markers:
- Non ossified Nasal Bone (LR= 6.6)
Mid-level markers:
- Nuchal skin fold (LR= 3.8)
- Cerebral ventriculomegaly (LR= 3.8)
- ARSA (Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery) (LR= 3.9)
Low-level markers:
- Echogenic bowel foci (LR= 1.6)
- Mild pyelectasis (LR= 1.1)
Soft Markers and Risk Assessment
It is important to realize that none of the soft markers for Down syndrome are abnormalities.
The way that most of these markers were determined is by reviewing either images or videotapes from ultrasound scans done of both normal babies and babies with Down syndrome.
If a certain percentage of normal babies carries one of these markers, but a higher percentage of Down syndrome pregnancies carries a marker, then the marker can be used to statistically adjust the Down syndrome risk calculation.
Overall, about 7 percent of pregnancies will show a soft marker increasing the risk calculation for Down syndrome.
About 93 percent of pregnancies will show no soft markers, and when no soft markers are seen, the Down syndrome risk calculation is lowered.
We multiply the risk calculation by a factor of 0.4, so that if the risk calculation was 1 per 1,000, and no soft markers are seen, then our final risk calculation would be 0.4 per 1,000.
Soft Marker Screening for Edaward Syndrome
Mid-level markers:
- Choroid plexus cysts (LR=7-10)
Other Article
-
The latest concept from the Association of Maternal and Fetal Medicine (SMFM) in 2017 on ultrasound soft markers of aneuploid disorders
-
Important points of the joint SOGC-CCMG guideline - No. 348, September 2017
-
Increases in AFP during pregnancy
-
The effect of father's age on increasing the risk of Down syndrome
-
Unconjugated estriol - fetal death marker
-
An overview of new pregnancy screening tips
-
Launch of cffDNA or NIPT testing in Iran under the license of Premaitha UK
-
Essential Basics of Pregnancy Screening
-
Two stage Perinatal screening
-
Second Trimester Screening or Quad Marker